Package Details: android-platform 29_r03-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/android-platform.git (read-only)
Package Base: android-platform
Description: Android SDK Platform, latest API
Upstream URL: http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html
Keywords: android development
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: android-platform-29
Provides: android-platform-29
Submitter: lestb
Maintainer: goetzc (ishitatsuyuki, Gioconda, florax, Skycoder42, Vrakfall)
Last Packager: Skycoder42
Votes: 172
Popularity: 0.600952
First Submitted: 2013-11-08 12:10
Last Updated: 2019-09-15 16:15

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-12 10:43

But in the meantime, android-sdk-platform-tools already updated to API 29.

Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-11 15:51

@Skycoder42 Oh yeah, I didn't pay much attention. I just saw it was in the SDK manager and made a package for it. Actually, I think we should wait too then. Sorry for the false flagging. The version 29 package is available for it anyway.

Skycoder42 commented on 2019-06-11 10:26

@Vrakfall I know that platform 29 is out, but AFAIK it is still in beta status? The question is: should we update this package before it gets the official release? I personally think we should at least wait for RC1, but other opinions (especially by the other comaintainers) are welcome.

Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-11 04:22

Also, API 29 is out. I made the package android-platform-29 if you want to just rip-off the PKGBUILD or I can also co-maintain this one. I haven't addressed the adb/fastboot issue there yet as I ran out of time to test it.

Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-09 10:33

With the added provides statement in the official repo's android-tools package, shouldn't this just require adb and fastboot? Does it even need adb actually (and technically)?

ishitatsuyuki commented on 2018-05-27 15:33

Downloaded three times from two different networks in Japan, and the checksum seems to be working for me. What I can tell from the comments is that either the Google guys seems to be messed up with two different versions of the zip, or maybe it's just a error HTML page.

arshlinux commented on 2018-03-07 18:14

==> Validating source files with sha384sums... platform-27_r01.zip ... FAILED

I have hash:

$ sha384sum platform-27_r01.zip

da778b2688355151e55fc1fe7763b67c087470c2afd1122007c04d58153c27bdcd5bb4ee0ca423e4e84bad243a87b95b platform-27_r01.zip

Can someone confirm and update?

blubbblubb commented on 2018-03-06 02:43

Not sure where the latest checksum came from but for me the zip actually has the checksum which was added on the 25th of February, not the newer one from the 3rd of March

Gioconda commented on 2018-03-03 15:20

Checksum updated.

hornak.bence commented on 2018-03-03 13:49

sha1sums=('dfda0862550768ed04a4fb0e03c322230aff9fdc')